Gallery of Nuts
RSS Feed


Web Counter
people who wish they were us

      ARCHIVES

August 2003

September 2003

October 2003

November 2003

December 2003

January 2004

February 2004

March 2004

April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

October 2010

January 2022

Friday, February 02, 2007
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Socialized Health Care

My long opposition to socialized health care was until quite recently based purely on a practical notion that although the idea was meritorious in intention, there is no way to implement an effective plan that will sustain the quality of health care we presently enjoy in this great nation. My cousin sent me a recent article which opened my eyes to a concept previously unimaginable to a "compassionate conservative" such as myself: Socialized Health Care is immoral. Leonard Peikoff, Health Insurance is not a "Right" http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=26465 (2007).

Particularly fascinating, to me anyway, was the concept that by demanding a right to health care, we are stripping the rights of the health care workers to their pursuit of happiness. With "rights" come government regulation far beyond that necessary to protect patients from negligent care. Doctors will have to make choices about the level of care based upon the costs associated and pressure from administration to keep those to a minimum, the liability if they do not treat the patient with the expensive, but better alternatives, the requirements of a peer review board, and pressure to only accept healthy patients to keep costs low and a good "performance record."

A desire to help others is no doubt one of the greatest intentions that the human mind can possess. It is, however, extremely immoral and irresponsible of us to demand that others give up their own rights to help. The liberals are now attempting to legislate morality, something they have bemoaned conservatives for attempting for years. (Same sex marriages anyone?)

The right to life is a right in the sense that no one may take an affirmative act to deprive you of that right without due process. Likewise the pursuit of happiness guarantees you the right to the pursuit, not the happiness itself. It places no burden on anyone else save that they do not interfere with those rights. Socialized medicine places the burden of care on everyone for everyone else. It will hog-tie doctors and limit access to health care until problems that could have been nipped in the bud have flowered, spread, and worsened.

Jeff C.


 
National Dairy Council -- Professional Convoginators -- The Good Word about Convoginatin' -- Chocolate Milk Myths
The Godfather Convoginator -- News for the Convoginator
CONVOGINATOR'S STORE